top of page
Search

Server-Sent Events vs. WebFlux

Server-Sent Events vs. WebFlux: An Example

This article demonstrates the implementation of Server-Sent Events (SSE) using both a client-side TypeScript service and a server-side Spring WebFlux REST API, providing a practical comparison between these technologies.


Introduction


Server-Sent Events (SSE) and WebFlux are technologies used for real-time data streaming in web applications. SSE is a unidirectional communication protocol that allows a server to push data to a client over a single, long-lived HTTP connection. WebFlux, part of Spring Web 5, is a reactive programming model designed for building asynchronous, non-blocking web applications.


Client-Side Implementation (TypeScript)


We'll create an SseService class in TypeScript to handle the client-side SSE connection.


TypeScript


// sse-service.ts

import { Flux, interval, map } from 'rxjs';


class SseService {

  private eventSource: EventSource | null = null;


  constructor(private url: string) {}


  connect(onMessage: (data: string) => void, onError: (error: Event) => void) {

    this.eventSource = new EventSource(this.url);


    this.eventSource.onmessage = (event) => {

      onMessage(event.data);

    };


    this.eventSource.onerror = (error) => {

      onError(error);

    };

  }


  disconnect() {

    if (this.eventSource) {

      this.eventSource.close();

      this.eventSource = null;

    }

  }


  static createWebFluxStream(intervalMs: number): Flux<string> {

    return interval(intervalMs).pipe(

      map((sequence) => `data: Event ${sequence}\n\n`)

    );

  }

}


export default SseService;

This class encapsulates the SSE connection logic. The connect method establishes the connection and sets up event listeners. The disconnect method closes the connection. The createWebFluxStream static method emulates a reactive stream using RxJS, useful for testing or server-side TypeScript implementations.


React Component (App.tsx)


We'll create a simple React component that uses the SseService to display received events.


TypeScript


// App.tsx

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

import SseService from './sse-service';


function App() {

  const [messages, setMessages] = useState<string[]>([]);

  const sseService = new SseService('/events');


  useEffect(() => {

    const handleMessage = (data: string) => {

      setMessages((prevMessages) => [...prevMessages, data]);

    };


    const handleError = (error: Event) => {

      console.error('SSE error:', error);

    };


    sseService.connect(handleMessage, handleError);


    return () => {

      sseService.disconnect();

    };

  }, []);


  return (

    <div>

      <h1>Server-Sent Events</h1>

      <ul>

        {messages.map((message, index) => (

          <li key={index}>{message}</li>

        ))}

      </ul>

    </div>

  );

}


export default App;

This component initializes the SseService, connects to the /events endpoint, and displays the received messages in a list.


Server-Side Implementation (Spring WebFlux)


We'll create a Spring WebFlux REST API endpoint that serves SSE events.


Java


import org.springframework.http.MediaType;

import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.GetMapping;

import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RestController;

import reactor.core.publisher.Flux;

import java.time.Duration;


@RestController

public class SseController {


    @GetMapping(value = "/events", produces = MediaType.TEXT_EVENT_STREAM_VALUE)

    public Flux<String> events() {

        return Flux.interval(Duration.ofSeconds(1))

                   .map(sequence -> "data: " + "Event " + sequence + "\n\n");

    }

}

This controller defines a /events endpoint that returns a Flux<String> representing the SSE stream. The Flux.interval operator emits a sequence of numbers at a specified interval, and the map operator transforms them into SSE-formatted strings.


Key Differences and Considerations


Directionality: SSE is unidirectional (server to client), while WebFlux supports bidirectional communication.

Complexity: SSE is simpler to implement for server-to-client updates, while WebFlux offers more advanced features for complex asynchronous scenarios.

Use Cases: SSE is ideal for real-time notifications and live feeds, while WebFlux is suitable for building highly concurrent and scalable web applications.

Error Handling: In both the client and server, proper error handling is essential to ensure the robustness of the SSE connection.

Disconnection Handling: Server-side logic should be designed to handle client disconnections gracefully, especially when dealing with database updates or other critical operations.

Webflux Usage: Webflux is a great framework to implement SSE, and is not a competing technology.

Running the Example


Server: Run the Spring Boot application.

Client: Run the React application.

Open the React application in a web browser. You should see the received events displayed in the list.

This example provides a clear understanding of how to implement SSE using TypeScript and Spring WebFlux, highlighting the key differences and considerations between these technologies.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
What we can learn from cats

That's a fascinating observation, and you've touched upon something quite profound about the apparent inner peace that some animals seem...

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2020 by LearnTeachMaster DevOps. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page